apterous.org

Johnny Canuck Duel #6666: Not exactly the duel of the beast.

Bradley Holland 85/89 maxes!

Matt Morrison 619/623

Gevin Chapwell Round 3 and also Round 7 in particular proved just too tough for the full maxes.

Matt Hamer Re: Johnny's observation, I wonder how the Duel numbering works. This was Duel 6666 (see URL), and Duel 1 was the first Duel back in August 2008... but not every number between 1 and 6666 corresponds to a Duel, as I believe there have been fewer than 4000 Duels. Duel 2999 doesn't exist, for example.

Chris Hare 28 February 2009 was Duel 477.
1 March 2009 was Duel 239. Answers on a postcard, please...

Johnny Canuck 27 February 2009 was Duel 237, and there was no Duel 238. There seems to have been an "Endurance Event" on 28 February, probably featuring one new duel per hour, and this replaced Duel 238 entirely. Not sure why they would pick an out-of-sequence run of numbers for the endurance duels though.

Matt Hamer The Duels used to be generated in blocks of many days. (I believe this was to give a good variation of time limits/formats/variants.) When voting came in, this blocking continued, although each Duel in the block had multiple choices. If I had to guess, the unusual numbering might be due to creation of blocks of Duels.