Sean D

Sean D Looks like dead ends are ok here by the rules? Taking the 1,2,3,4,5100->201 example, if I declare 4 away, i.e. 205, and my solution is 4+5 (=9), 2x(100+3)-1 =205

Show all comments
Chris Hare

Chris Hare Yes, that should be fine.

Jason Turner

Jason Turner 1st number being the one to the right?

Chris Hare

Chris Hare I'm sorry, I'm not sure I understand the question.

Matthew Brockwell

Matthew Brockwell It’s the first number used in your solution the rules refer to, not the first number that appears in the selection.

Ravi Choudhary

Ravi Choudhary Really, really tricky! You have to go against your instincts to not get the target.

Tourney round: The Twelve Games of Chris-mas: Vol. III: So, Hare it is, Merry Chris-mas: Game Nine

<< Game Eight | Game Ten >>

Notes from the organizer: Game Nine! May I have this hokey-cokey?

Game Nine is a perfectly ordinary Numbers Attack with a rather un-ordinary scoring system. Hopefully, I'll explain it in a coherent and lucid manner such that you can understand even after a bucketful of sprouts and a lump of Yule log the size of a small child.

In this game, you'll score a point for every round that you successfully declare and make a number that is X away from the target, where X is the first number you use in your solution. Note that your solution must be a scoring one, and I'll use your solution as reported by Apterous. Here's an example:

The selection is [1,2,3,4,5,100] and the target is 201.
-- Janet declares 200. She does 1*100=100, 2*100=200. She scores a point, because 200 is one away from 201, and she used 1 as the first number in her calculations.
-- Wilberforce declares 203. He does 2*100=200, 200+3=203. He scores a point, because 203 is two away from 201, and he used 2 as the first number in his calculations.
-- Archibald declares 207. He will score no points at all, because 207 is 6 away from 201, and there's no 6 in the selection for him to use.
-- Veronica declares 101. This is technically possible (because she can do 100+1=101), but Apterous won't record it because it's more than 10 away from the target, so she scores no points.

If you use the Notes box to enter your solution, please be aware that Apterous might parse it in an order you don't intend. For example, If you type 1+(2*3), Apterous will report your solution as 2*3=6, 1+6=7, so the first number will be 2.

The player who scores the most points in this way will win. Ties will be broken in favour of the player with the higher game score, then in favour of the player who has used the greater number of different Xs. Any remaining ties will be broken at my sole discretion.

The BONUS TOURNAMENT POINT will be awarded to any player who scores at least 80 actual Apterous points during their game. (So if this all sounds far too much like hard work, score 80 points by playing normally and you'll get the BTP.)

If you have any questions about the rules, scoring, or anything else pertaining to this tourney, please feel free to ask.

Here is a spreadsheet: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1ihS3JL1pa50yoy-U7fJ55vhry0rynVbOsW6Z_lWgNdM/edit?usp=sharing

Ran from: 16 December 2024 – 1 January 2025. Format: Numbers Attack. Matches: One-off. Level scores: Drawn. Approved.

Organizers: Chris Hare.

Fixtures: 46. Completed: 46.

Results and fixtures

Player 1Player 2Status
Andy SCApterous Prune0 – 0
Dave RobjohnsApterous Prune97 – 0
Martin ThomasApterous Prune74 – 0
Elizabeth BeerApterous Prune117 – 0
Matt OCApterous Prune89 – 0
Sarah BinnsApterous Prune24 – 0
Damian McEvoyApterous Prune138 – 0
Matthew TassierApterous Prune114 – 0
Ian WrayApterous Prune103 – 0
Florence C-LApterous Prune118 – 0
Sean DApterous Prune110 – 0
Jamie FrenchApterous Prune89 – 0
Wesley BartonApterous Prune90 – 0
Elwin CarlosApterous Prune109 – 0
Tom CapplemanApterous Prune115 – 0
Fi ThorneApterous Prune70 – 0
Colin ThompsonApterous Prune87 – 0
Fiona TApterous Prune89 – 0
Hazel DruryApterous Prune174 – 0
Zohaib RehanApterous Prune86 – 0
Ben BazzardApterous Prune89 – 0
Thomas CareyApterous Prune106 – 0
Steven OldhamApterous Prune93 – 0
Ian VolanteApterous Prune98 – 0
Matthew BrockwellApterous Prune90 – 0
Anthony EndsorApterous Prune72 – 0
Maria ChandlerApterous Prune107 – 0
Jon ElmerApterous Prune97 – 0
Trevor BissettApterous Prune92 – 0
Adam LatchfordApterous Prune108 – 0
Jack WorsleyApterous Prune109 – 0
Bradley HorrocksApterous Prune119 – 0
Jason C.Apterous Prune83 – 0
Adrian FletcherApterous Prune69 – 0
Jason TurnerApterous Prune170 – 0
Steven HardingApterous Prune129 – 0
Dan SpinksApterous Prune90 – 0
Mike LeeApterous Prune129 – 0
Dave KempshallApterous Prune74 – 0
Dan SouthwellApterous Prune111 – 0
Trevor PottsApterous Prune93 – 0
David HolmesApterous Prune89 – 0
Ravi ChoudharyApterous Prune83 – 0
Tal LessnerApterous Prune123 – 0
Perry SarbApterous Prune88 – 0
Richard DeckerApterous Prune94 – 0

Key. Green: winner. Red: loser. Grey: tie.

This website is not endorsed by or affiliated with Channel 4, the makers of Countdown, or any person associated with the aforementioned in any way whatsoever at all, never has been, never will be, and moreover is proud not to be. Yep.

Page generated in 0.0312 seconds. It's 14:56:09 on Monday 17 August 2026 here at Apterous Towers. Design and all good stuff copyright © Charles Reams 2008–2026. In memory of Phillip Harcort Collinge, never forgotten. Some graphical and aesthetic elements by Matt Morrison and Jon O'Neill.