Zarte Siempre

Zarte Siempre http://www.apterous.org/viewgame.php?game=1259972

Jamie M

Jamie M Ok. So I definitely owe Zarte an apology for this for wasting his time and generally messing him around on it.

I really don't want to change the challenge rules after setting it, but given the choice of admitting early on to making a mistake and having to discount a few early games (see above), and leaving a broken challenge up for nearly three weeks just to keep some consistency, I think I have to do the former.

ADDITIONAL RULE: the word length used cannot be the maximum possible length for words in the variant. So for Junior variants this is 7, for Octo variants and Deepdown this is 8, for 9-letter variants this is 9, for Hyper variants this is 12 and for Spoilage this is 45.

In trying to set up the scoring for this I realised that I couldn't allow Spoilage AND standard scoring (45 is a big number), hence the Stepdown scoring. I did however forget how often you can get 7s in some Junior variants (Touch and, if you're a better picker than me, Goat) which is the main...

Jamie M

Jamie M ...problem here. It applies to Touchdown 9s to a lesser extent, since their high frequency doesn't necessarily mean you can consistently get them round after round. It hasn't exactly come across but I wanted the number of declared words and number of maxes to be two separate things here, hence why both are used in the scoring.

I really hope there's nothing else wrong with this. It's debatable whether I should be changing anything now anyway, so if there's anything else that turns out to not work well I'll just have to leave it as it is.

Sorry again about all of this, especially to you Zarte :(

[ADDITIONAL RULE IN ABOVE COMMENT, PLEASE READ]

Richard Freeland

Richard Freeland I think this works:
http://www.apterous.org/viewgame.php?game=1260082

Quinn James

Quinn James Would it be acceptable to do this in CSW?

Quinn James

Quinn James If so, here's my first attempt: http://www.apterous.org/viewgame.php?game=1260110

That would be 1062, but I think I can do better with some experimentation.

Stephen R

Stephen R I make this 2212: http://www.apterous.org/viewgame.php?game=1260306

Jamie M

Jamie M Sorry Quinn, all Revolver challenges need to be done in English because I have less of an idea of max length frequencies etc. in other dictionaries. I'll start specifying this from now on.

* Stephen R 2212
* Richard Freeland 678

Jon Stitcher

Jon Stitcher Didn't set this as stepdown but had I done it would have been 11 x 196 which is 2156.

Up to you if you allow it

http://www.apterous.org/viewgame.php?game=1265976

Tom Cappleman

Tom Cappleman 1270 I think: http://www.apterous.org/viewgame.php?game=1266009

Jamie M

Jamie M [From above, since it's gone off the page:

ADDITIONAL RULE (added on first day): the word length used cannot be the maximum possible length for words in the variant. So for Junior variants this is 7, for Octo variants and Deepdown this is 8, for 9-letter variants this is 9, for Hyper variants this is 12 and for Spoilage this is 45.]

That's fine Jon, Stepdown isn't too hard to work out. I make your score 1,360 though - the 6s score 136 points with 10 maxes.

Stephen R 2212
* Jon Stitcher 1360
* Thomas Cappleman 1270
Richard Freeland 678

Tom Cappleman

Tom Cappleman 1458: http://www.apterous.org/viewgame.php?game=1266313

Jamie M

Jamie M Stephen R 2212
* Thomas Cappleman 1458
Jon Stitcher 1360
Richard Freeland 678

Matthew Tassier

Matthew Tassier 4294: http://www.apterous.org/viewgame.php?game=1270908

Zarte Siempre

Zarte Siempre I didn't think tie-breaks were good? Or was that another of these things, I can't remember.

Jamie M

Jamie M Sorry if I haven't specified it anywhere but tie breaks DON'T count for these, sorry about that Matthew. I feel like it'd cause a lot of problems if I did. Over 20 rounds you got 13x166 though - still a good score btw - so I'll add that in.

Stephen R 2212
* Matthew Tassier 2158
Thomas Cappleman 1458
Jon Stitcher 1360
Richard Freeland 678

Matthew Tassier

Matthew Tassier Cheers, thought that would probably be the ruling, but no harm in trying my luck, eh?

Jamie M

Jamie M True, if you don't ask and I didn't say then there's no way of finding out. I guess it slipped my mind (often I say something along the lines of "make sure it's a 20-round game with alternate picks" etc but I happened not to say that in the rules this time), since player v player games haven't featured much.

4,000 is the perfect raw score for this challenge then.

Show all comments
Jamie M

Jamie M Last day for this, make sure to comment with a link if you haven't already. L3 will be up late but still some time tomorrow :)

Callum Todd

Callum Todd http://www.apterous.org/viewgame.php?game=1261417

I think that's 2324.

Zarte Siempre

Zarte Siempre I can't remember what this is. And my maths has proven poor on your thingies so far, so you can do it :P

http://www.apterous.org/viewgame.php?game=1260792

Richard Freeland

Richard Freeland This might be 1216
http://www.apterous.org/viewgame.php?game=1272227

Jamie M

Jamie M Here's how this finished, with raw and final scores shown to confirm the most recent submissions.

1st ZARTE SIEMPRE 2464 -> 100
2nd CALLUM TODD 2324 -> 80
3rd STEPHEN R 2212 -> 70
4th Matthew Tassier 2158 -> 60
5th Thomas Cappleman 1458 -> 30
6th Jon Stitcher 1360 -> 26
7th Richard Freeland 1216 -> 20

Thanks to everyone who played, the overall leaderboard is being updated now. Challenge L3 replaces this, and it's called Metamax if you want to have a go :)

Tourney round: Revolver: Challenge L2 - Pancake

<< Challenge M1 - Split | Challenge N2 - Endurance >>

Notes from the organizer: Welcome to Revolver, what I hope will be an on-going set of Apterous challenges for you to try as much as you like. The idea is that I set a challenge once every five days, and that each one runs for 20 days so four challenges run at any time. This one is letters-based, and the challenges will rotate through letters, numbers, conundrums and a mix of all three.

You can play whichever challenges you like; all you need to do is sign up to one on its round page (mostly so I have an idea of what people are interested in and what to set in future) and get started on it. Every challenge has an objective you need to complete, with extra points available depending on how you do it. These points then get converted into final scores as follows:

1st place: 100 points
2nd place: 80 points
3rd place: 70 points
All others: scaled between 20 and 60 points

The tournament has an overall leaderboard which is the total of all these final scores you've achieved. And here it is! https://sites.google.com/site/apterousrevolver/leaderboard

So, here's the latest one, numbered L2 because it's letters challenge #2.

Name: PANCAKE (the last one was Pangram, thought I'd carry on where I left off)
Objective: Score at least 100 points, getting at least five maxes, in a Stepdown-scored Letters Attack with words of equal length.
Variant/format: A Letters Attack IN ANY VARIANT, using Stepdown scoring. This is standard in Aegilops and Omelette (as well as in a Step Letters Attack in Normal), but for any other variant you'll need to set up a custom game. If you do that make sure it's with alternating player picks and the standard round time for the variant.
Scoring: The number of points scored using the words of equal length, multiplied by the number of maxes that this includes. So 110 points including 10 maxes would be 1,100. Obviously these will get scaled down a lot at the end, since the winner gets 100.

If you complete the challenge and want me to know about it, COMMENT ON THIS PAGE with a link to your game. If you better it, comment again and that will replace your previous game. After every few completions I'll put up a table of who's scored what.

Hopefully that's all clear, but if not let me know. Good luck everyone!

Ran from: 6 – 25 April 2014. Format: Step Letters Attack. Matches: One-off. Approved.

Organizers: Jamie M.

Fixtures: 7. Completed: 7.

This website is not endorsed by or affiliated with Channel 4, the makers of Countdown, or any person associated with the aforementioned in any way whatsoever at all, never has been, never will be, and moreover is proud not to be. Yep.

Page generated in 0.0797 seconds. It's 22:16:26 on Sunday 5 May 2024 here at Apterous Towers. Design and all good stuff copyright © Charles Reams 2008–2024. In memory of Phillip Harcort Collinge, never forgotten. Some graphical and aesthetic elements by Matt Morrison and Jon O'Neill.